<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Compliance Software &#187; regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://compliancesoftware.org/tag/regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://compliancesoftware.org</link>
	<description>Regulatory Compliance Software - News Information and Links</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t view HIPAA fines as cost a of doing business &#8211; FierceCIO</title>
		<link>http://compliancesoftware.org/2011/03/01/dont-view-hipaa-fines-as-cost-a-of-doing-business-fiercecio/</link>
		<comments>http://compliancesoftware.org/2011/03/01/dont-view-hipaa-fines-as-cost-a-of-doing-business-fiercecio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>compliancesoftware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hipaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesoftware.org/?p=1314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2011/03/01/dont-view-hipaa-fines-as-cost-a-of-doing-business-fiercecio/" title="Don&#039;t view HIPAA fines as cost a of doing business - FierceCIO"></a>If anyone doubted that there is a cost to ignoring privacy regulations, $5.3 million in penalties doled out last week for violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) should put such doubt to rest. Not only is &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2011/03/01/dont-view-hipaa-fines-as-cost-a-of-doing-business-fiercecio/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compliancesoftware.org/2011/03/01/dont-view-hipaa-fines-as-cost-a-of-doing-business-fiercecio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An SMB Guide to Credit Card Regulations #PCI</title>
		<link>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/10/21/an-smb-guide-to-credit-card-regulations-pci/</link>
		<comments>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/10/21/an-smb-guide-to-credit-card-regulations-pci/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>compliancesoftware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment card industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesoftware.org/?p=1202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/10/21/an-smb-guide-to-credit-card-regulations-pci/" title="An SMB Guide to Credit Card Regulations #PCI"></a>This article is the first in a short series designed to help small businesses understand the regulations around securing credit card transactions, specifically the PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry’s Data Security Standard) requirements. via An SMB Guide to Credit Card &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/10/21/an-smb-guide-to-credit-card-regulations-pci/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/10/21/an-smb-guide-to-credit-card-regulations-pci/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data breach prevention top of mind for healthcare IT decision makers (WTN News)</title>
		<link>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/08/22/data-breach-prevention-top-of-mind-for-healthcare-it-decision-makers-wtn-news/</link>
		<comments>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/08/22/data-breach-prevention-top-of-mind-for-healthcare-it-decision-makers-wtn-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>compliancesoftware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hipaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesoftware.org/?p=1103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/08/22/data-breach-prevention-top-of-mind-for-healthcare-it-decision-makers-wtn-news/" title="Data breach prevention top of mind for healthcare IT decision makers (WTN News)"></a>According to the survey, 80 percent of respondents say securing patient information from unauthorized access and data breaches is a top priority, and 76 percent claim breach of confidential information or unauthorized access to clinical applications as their greatest security &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/08/22/data-breach-prevention-top-of-mind-for-healthcare-it-decision-makers-wtn-news/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/08/22/data-breach-prevention-top-of-mind-for-healthcare-it-decision-makers-wtn-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visa Clarifies Security Rules</title>
		<link>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/07/19/visa-clarifies-security-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/07/19/visa-clarifies-security-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>compliancesoftware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesoftware.org/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/07/19/visa-clarifies-security-rules/" title="Visa Clarifies Security Rules"></a>This week Visa Inc. said it’s going to reduce unnecessary storage of sensitive card information in merchant payment systems. Specifically, Visa is clarifying that existing operating regulations ensure acquirers and issuers allow merchants to present a truncated, disguised or masked &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/07/19/visa-clarifies-security-rules/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/07/19/visa-clarifies-security-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC pushes back identity theft rules deadline &#8212; for fifth time</title>
		<link>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/06/02/ftc-pushes-back-identity-theft-rules-deadline-for-fifth-time/</link>
		<comments>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/06/02/ftc-pushes-back-identity-theft-rules-deadline-for-fifth-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 03:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>compliancesoftware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesoftware.org/?p=1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/06/02/ftc-pushes-back-identity-theft-rules-deadline-for-fifth-time/" title="FTC pushes back identity theft rules deadline -- for fifth time"></a>The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has once again pushed back its enforcement deadline for an identity theft &#8211;lated regulation called the Red Flags Rule. The rule requires financial institutions and other organizations that extend consumer credit to develop and implement &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/06/02/ftc-pushes-back-identity-theft-rules-deadline-for-fifth-time/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/06/02/ftc-pushes-back-identity-theft-rules-deadline-for-fifth-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMA and AOA Sue Federal Trade Commission to Exclude Physicians From &#8220;Red Flags Rules&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/05/25/ama-and-aoa-sue-federal-trade-commission-to-exclude-physicians-from-red-flags-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/05/25/ama-and-aoa-sue-federal-trade-commission-to-exclude-physicians-from-red-flags-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 19:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>compliancesoftware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesoftware.org/?p=1023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/05/25/ama-and-aoa-sue-federal-trade-commission-to-exclude-physicians-from-red-flags-rules/" title="AMA and AOA Sue Federal Trade Commission to Exclude Physicians From &quot;Red Flags Rules&quot;"></a>The American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) today filed a lawsuit against the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to prevent the agency from subjecting medical practices to identify-theft regulations called &#8220;Red Flags Rules.&#8221; via AMA and &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/05/25/ama-and-aoa-sue-federal-trade-commission-to-exclude-physicians-from-red-flags-rules/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/05/25/ama-and-aoa-sue-federal-trade-commission-to-exclude-physicians-from-red-flags-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OCR sets rules for sharing HIPAA breach information &#8211; FierceEMR</title>
		<link>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/04/16/ocr-sets-rules-for-sharing-hipaa-breach-information-fierceemr/</link>
		<comments>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/04/16/ocr-sets-rules-for-sharing-hipaa-breach-information-fierceemr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>compliancesoftware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hipaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesoftware.org/?p=971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/04/16/ocr-sets-rules-for-sharing-hipaa-breach-information-fierceemr/" title="OCR sets rules for sharing HIPAA breach information - FierceEMR"></a>In a notice published Tuesday in the Federal Register, OCR spells out ways in which it will use information reported via a computer system called the Program Information Management System. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act tightens HIPAA regulations to &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/04/16/ocr-sets-rules-for-sharing-hipaa-breach-information-fierceemr/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/04/16/ocr-sets-rules-for-sharing-hipaa-breach-information-fierceemr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Considerations for Compliance in the Cloud</title>
		<link>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/01/27/top-considerations-for-compliance-in-the-cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/01/27/top-considerations-for-compliance-in-the-cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>compliancesoftware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesoftware.org/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/01/27/top-considerations-for-compliance-in-the-cloud/" title="Top Considerations for Compliance in the Cloud"></a>How one uses the cloud is most dependent how compliant you intend to be. Once you understand the individual compliance regulations and specific requirements, it’s likely that you (and your data) can live comfortably on the cloud. via Top Considerations &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/01/27/top-considerations-for-compliance-in-the-cloud/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/01/27/top-considerations-for-compliance-in-the-cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comply And/Or Die: Conforming With Multiple Regulations &#8212; Compliance &#8212; InformationWeek</title>
		<link>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/01/27/comply-andor-die-conforming-with-multiple-regulations-compliance-informationweek/</link>
		<comments>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/01/27/comply-andor-die-conforming-with-multiple-regulations-compliance-informationweek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>compliancesoftware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FISMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO/IEC 27002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesoftware.org/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/01/27/comply-andor-die-conforming-with-multiple-regulations-compliance-informationweek/" title="Comply And/Or Die: Conforming With Multiple Regulations -- Compliance -- InformationWeek"></a>&#8230; When we asked the 379 respondents to our InformationWeek Analytics survey on regulatory compliance how many requirement sets their organizations are addressing, the No. 1 answer was four or more, at 35%. via Comply And/Or Die: Conforming With Multiple &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/01/27/comply-andor-die-conforming-with-multiple-regulations-compliance-informationweek/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compliancesoftware.org/2010/01/27/comply-andor-die-conforming-with-multiple-regulations-compliance-informationweek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Report Helps Enterprises Choose Their Own DAM Products &#8211; database security/Security &#8211; DarkReading</title>
		<link>http://compliancesoftware.org/2009/12/02/new-report-helps-enterprises-choose-their-own-dam-products-database-securitysecurity-darkreading/</link>
		<comments>http://compliancesoftware.org/2009/12/02/new-report-helps-enterprises-choose-their-own-dam-products-database-securitysecurity-darkreading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>compliancesoftware</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hipaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://compliancesoftware.org/?p=772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2009/12/02/new-report-helps-enterprises-choose-their-own-dam-products-database-securitysecurity-darkreading/" title="New Report Helps Enterprises Choose Their Own DAM Products - database security/Security - DarkReading"></a>Some DAM products provide features for privileged-user monitoring and basic database auditing, two areas that have historically been underserved. Need more? The use of DAM technology is starting to be considered an essential control when demonstrating compliance with industry regulations &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://compliancesoftware.org/2009/12/02/new-report-helps-enterprises-choose-their-own-dam-products-database-securitysecurity-darkreading/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://compliancesoftware.org/2009/12/02/new-report-helps-enterprises-choose-their-own-dam-products-database-securitysecurity-darkreading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

